![]() It feels like they threw in a lot of not-really-calendar functions to try to justify the subscription price. They added things like weather (I built my own weather tracking system, theirs is useless baggage to me), and interfacing with videoconferencing - I make all those calls from my work computer where I won’t be installing Fantastical, so actionable alerts are useless to me. They made the UI prettier at the expense of showing less information on the screen - I valued Fantastical for its dense information display. In my case, I loved Fantastical, used it every day, and recommended it to lots of people, right up until the release that coincided with the subscription model - they added a lot of features I didn’t want and/or didn’t care about, and wanted to use their servers for some of my data. Companies are making the decision to turn their backs on this latter category of casual users, either with the expectation that their most dedicated users can carry them, or the misperception that a lot larger percentage of their users are enormous fans of the app. Subscriptions at non-trivial prices tend to separate out the handful of users that really depend on the app from the sea of users who like the app but don’t need it to survive. There are plenty of apps where I’d be happy to pay $10 or $20 every couple of years, for a new version, if they keep bringing useful updates, but the app isn’t worth $5/month to me (to be clear, a handful of apps are worth that to me). In many cases, I’m not comfortable with this. Apple built a pretty decent system for every app on the store to have access to data storage per-user on Apple’s servers, but companies keep wanting to put your data to their own servers. But these days, every developer is looking for ways to add subscriptions to their app. A shame.Ĭlick to expand.I don’t mind subscriptions if the app is really important to me and they have, say, recurring server costs. They also won't burn their user base and still have a bridge out for when the subscription bubble bursts.īut they didn't listen to my suggestion it seems. They can have the one time revenue from users who hate it. And for users like me who HATE subscriptions you can get us to pay upfront, but having it priced equal to 5 years of the annual sub only a few users will go that route.Įveryone is happier and they can have the subscription revenue from users who like that model. You're paying only for new features which are hard to justify paying as much as Office for. ~$1/m or so makes perfect sense for a Calendar App since the "data" you're storing is all on your phone or server somewhere else. You can purchase a lifetime subscription to the app for $60 one time and get access to all future releases.Īll subscriptions support Family Sharing at no extra charge. ![]() You can subscribe to the app for $1/m and get every release major and minor as long as your subscription is active.ģ. You get free updates for minor releases to the major release and paid upgrades to whatever major release if you chose to upgrade.Ģ. Major releases can be purchased as a one time purchase in the App Store. ![]() Honestly duplicating the infuse pricing model would probably get them what they want without having burned their user base in the process!ġ. Click on the specific message you were looking for and it will take you into the message at the place of that conversation.When they first launched the subscription model I wrote them a longer email on the topic.For example, “Happy” or “Merry” showed me all the old Happy Birthday and Merry Christmas messages I had from friends as well as any other text message wherein “happy” or “merry” appeared.Tap the search bar and type either the person or phrase that you’re looking for.Īlso Read: 7 Tricks to free up space on iPhone.Just scroll back to the top and you’ll see it.) It’s worth noting my iPhone is running on iOS 10, but this will work with an iPhone running at least iOS 9. For instance, I was able to pull up all the Merry Christmas texts I received enough though it’s been months, and I’ve chatted with those people since.Īnother nice feature iMessage search has is the ability to go directly to the phrase I’m looking for within the message. However it can look through the history of the messages in your list. ![]() The search function can only look through present messages, which means if you’ve swiped left to delete a previous text message, it will not show up when you search your history. Searching through iMessage history can be a pain in the butt.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |